Search Results for "Bombay Blast"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Blast"

163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

22 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Involving IED Blast and MCOC Act — Appellant Enlarged on Bail Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Long Incarceration. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA and Section 21(4) of MCOC Act do not bar bail if no prima facie case is made out, and prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21.

15 Jul 2022

The appellant, Satyanarayana Rani, aged 72, was arrested on 11 June 2019 in connection with an IED blast that occurred on 1 May 2019 under a bridge on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

18 Mar 2014

The appellant, Tanaji Dadasaheb Sargar, was convicted by the III Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, on 4 July 2005 in Sessions Case No.259 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Bomb Blast Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Rs. 2,00,000 with Interest. Death of a passenger due to bomb explosion in a train compartment is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is strictly liable to pay compensation.

27 Jun 2011

The appellant, Smt. Santabai Dattatraya Kadam, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent to Outrage Modesty Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

20 Apr 2011

The appellant, Sanjay Madhavrao Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga in Sessions Case No. 10 of 2000 for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging POTA Sanction and Review Committee's Confirmation. Court upholds validity of sanction under Section 45 of POTA and affirms that POTA Review Committee has jurisdiction to confirm or revoke sanction under Section 60 of POTA.

17 Sep 2010

The petitioners, who were accused in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole Leave to Convict in Bombay Bomb Blast Case Despite Adverse Police Report — Prior Furlough Surrender and Good Conduct Considered. The court set aside the Divisional Commissioner's order rejecting parole, holding that the petitioner's history of timely surrender during previous releases negated the police apprehension.

15 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Mohammed Parvez Zulfikar Qureshi, a convict in the Bombay Bomb Blast case sentenced to life imprisonment under TADA (P) Act, 1987, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Appeal in POTA Case — Confessional Statement of Co-Accused and Recovery of AK-56 Rifle Considered Sufficient for Prima Facie Case. The court held that the confessional statement of a co-accused and recovery of an AK-56 rifle are relevant considerations for denying bail under Section 49 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.

19 Dec 2005

The appellant, Aatif Nasir Mulla, was an accused in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 pending before the Special Court, Mumbai, for his alleged involvem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing burn injuries to victim set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

11 Aug 2005

The appellant, Sou Kamal Raju Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of her sister-in-law, Lata, under Section 30...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanctioning Authority's Application of Mind Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Documents. The court held that Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not require supply of documents to the accused before grant of sanction, and the sanction order was valid as the authority had perused the relevant material.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were employees of a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition challenging the sanction for prosecution granted under Secti...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)