Search Results for "Binding settlement"

1602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application for Non-Pending Assessment Proceedings. Settlement Application Filed Before Expiry of Reassessment Limitation Does Not Constitute Pending Proceedings Under Section 245A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, M/s. Shriniwas Machine Craft Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in fabrication of sheet metal canopies for diesel generating sets, filed a w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practices Order. Settlement Clause Denying Benefits to Later-Recruited Workmen Held Invalid Under Proviso to Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The matter arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by Ceat Ltd. challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Settlement Implementation. Settlement under Section 2(p) read with Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 binding on all workmen.

The case involves a letters patent appeal filed by 24 workmen against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28th September 199...