KAHC010341872013_1
6 Jan 2014...
Search Results for "Articles 303"
321 result(s) found
Found 321 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Goa Rural Improvement and Welfare Cess Act, 2000; Petitioners Allege Violation of Articles 14, 301, 303, 304 and GST Subsumption. Cess on Transportation of Iron Ore and Coal into Goa is Examined for Constitutionality and Competence After GST.
10 Jan 2024The Goa Rural Improvement and Welfare Cess Act, 2000 was enacted to augment revenue for improvement of infrastructure and health, to promote welfare o...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appellant’s Application in Arbitration Dispute, Holding No Limitation Period Applies to Section 20 of Arbitration Act. The Court ruled that Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, does not govern applications under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, as the legislature intended a different scheme by amending Articles 158 and 178 but not 181.
26 Sep 1968The dispute arose from a contract dated March 8, 1945, under which the appellant agreed to supply meat to the Government of India. The contract contai...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
1 Jan 1970The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...
- 162
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.
16 Jun 2026The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.
9 Mar 2021The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Filing of Written Statement Does Not Waive Right to Seek Arbitration.
3 Jun 2019The petitioner, M/S Alang Metal Exim Pvt. Ltd., filed a money suit (O.S.No.3749/2013) against the respondents, MSTC Limited and The Fertilizers & Chem...
- 101
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.
9 Dec 1968The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Judicature of Bombay Quashes State Government Interference in Municipal Election Process, Upholds Bar on Court Intervention Post-Notification. Court Holds That Once Election Process is Imminent, Courts Should Not Interfere, Reiterating the Role of State Election Commission and the Exclusivity of Election Petitions.
2 Dec 2016The writ petition was filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court by Shilpa Pardeshi against the State of Maharashtra, the State Electi...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Relief Order in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Without Prejudging Merits. Industrial Court's Order Granting Rs.3,500 Per Month to Workmen Set Aside for Lack of Consideration of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Under Section 10(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Aug 2011The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), challenged an order dated 15/04/2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Akola Bench, in Reference (BIR) No...
- 106
