Search Results for "Article 289"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Article 289"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

19 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Matters to Final Hearing on Whether Pre-execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Orders Can Be on Grounds Beyond Alka Subhash Gadia Exceptions. The Court Examined if New Grounds Such as Absence of Live Link and Delay Could Be Used to Challenge Detention Orders Before Execution.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of matters challenging detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in FERA Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Opportunity Notice and Violation of Speedy Trial. The Court quashed criminal complaints and summoning orders against Standard Chartered Bank and its officer for offences under FERA, holding that the proviso to Section 61(2) of FERA requires a mandatory opportunity notice before prosecution, and that inordinate delay of over 20 years violated Article 21.

21 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Standard Chartered Bank and its officer against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which declined to quash two crimin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Based on Composition of Dispute Through Memorandum of Understanding. The Court held that the composition of the dispute between the parties is a valid ground for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

8 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Mrs. Usha Badri Poonawalla, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition by Tenants in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32F(1) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act Mandates Tenant to Give Intimation Within One Year of Widow Landlady's Death; Failure to Do So Extinguishes Right to Purchase. Landlady's earlier exercise of right under Section 31(1) to resume land for personal cultivation does not dispense with the statutory requirement of notice under Section 32F(1), and non-compliance results in loss of tenancy right and possession reverting to landlord under Section 32P.

3 Jun 2019

The dispute arose from a tenancy over agricultural land in Satara district. The petitioners were tenants in possession since the tillers' day, and the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962, with no jurisdictional error or illegality.

15 Jul 2022

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Customs Authorities and Dismisses Accused's Appeal, Holding Prosecution for Smuggling Not Barred by Prior Customs Adjudication Under Article 20(2). Section 173(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 Does Not Apply to Complaint Cases, and Section 94 Does Not Authorise Court to Direct Supply of Documents to Accused.

16 Oct 1968

The case arose from cross-appeals against a Bombay High Court order in a criminal revision, concerning the maintainability of a criminal prosecution f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in Transfer Pricing Adjustment. Failure to Provide TPO's Draft Order and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio Under Sections 144C and 92CA of Income Tax Act, 1961.

12 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Undercarriage and Tractor Parts Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-2016 on 30 September 2015 declaring a l...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)