Search Results for "Article 21-A"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Upholds Mother's Custody Based on Child's Welfare. The court held that the welfare of the child is paramount, and the mother's custody was in the child's best interest under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

The case involves a custody dispute between the appellant father, Mr. Arun Sharma, a Hindu, and the respondent mother, Roxann Sharma, a Christian Amer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Increase in BHMS Admission Capacity. AYUSH Ministry's decision to reject increase from 50 to 100 seats upheld as per Section 21A of the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973.

The petitioners, Disha Shikshan Vikas Kendra and E.B. Gadkari Homeopathy Medical College and Hospital, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Reimburse Fees for Backward Class Students in Private Unaided Schools - State's Obligation Under Article 21-A and RTE Act

The petitions raised questions about the liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to back...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Educational Institutions' Petitions Against Refusal of No-Objection Certificates for Upgradation of Schools. The Court held that the State's policy of refusing NOC for rural schools was arbitrary and discriminatory, violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by various educational societies and trusts (petitioners) against the State of Maharashtra and i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Fees Hike and Denial of Free Education Under Article 21A. Held that Right to Free Education Under Article 21A is Subject to State Legislation and Not Absolute Against Private Unaided Schools.

The petitioner, Rekha Lakhi Totlani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...