SECOND APPEAL NO.538 2005
7 Dec 2011...
Search Results for "Article 124"
1167 result(s) found
Found 1167 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Conditions for Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act. Court holds that pre-deposit of differential duty and interest as condition for provisional release under Section 110A is not warranted and modifies conditions to require only bank guarantee and bond.
25 Jul 2011The petitioners, Apollo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. and another, imported nine cranes between 17 November 2005 and 6 April 2010, which were assessed and bills of...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.
21 Jul 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...
- 52
High Court
- 99
High Court
- 85
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Challenge to National Investigation Agency Notice Dated 10 July 2020 Infructuous as Petitioner is Witness and Trial Commenced. The petitioner's challenge to Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was not pressed because the constitutional validity of that section was pending before the Supreme Court and the IPC was repealed by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, leaving only the constitutional validity of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for consideration.
17 Jul 2025The judgment under consideration arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature a...
High Court
- 121
High Court
- 69
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Transfer of Rectification Petitions Under Trade Marks Act; Statutory Rectification Jurisdiction Confined to High Court Exercising Appellate Jurisdiction over Appropriate Registry. Interpretation of Sections 47 and 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Rule 4 of Trade Mark Rules, 2017, Precludes Exercise of Jurisdiction by High Court Over Entries Made by Another Registry.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, a company engaged in trade mark disputes, had filed a civil suit before the Madras High Court (Commercial Division) for infringement a...
- 69
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.
1 Jan 1970The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...
- 86
