Search Results for "Article 11(b)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Article 11(b)"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. The court held that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is not warranted when the plaint on its face shows a cause of action and the issues of limitation and res judicata require trial.

27 Mar 2026

The case involves three civil revision petitions filed by the 3rd defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. The plaintiff...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

15 May 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

High Court

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

10 Jun 2024

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Part Regarding Stamp Duty on Arbitral Award in Execution Proceedings — Directs Payment of Proper Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The court held that stamp duty on an arbitral award is payable at the rate applicable on the date of the award, not the date of execution petition, and the decree-holder is liable to pay the same.

28 Jul 2023

The case involves two writ petitions arising from execution proceedings in Com.Ex.Pet.No.224/2021 before the LXXXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Jud...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Interest on Delayed Rebate Claims Under Central Excise Act. Interest Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 Held Payable from Expiry of Three Months from Date of Receipt of Rebate Claim, Not from Date of Final Adjudication.

30 Jan 2012

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (Petitioner) and Jindal Drugs Limited (Respondent) regarding the payment of interest on delayed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate of Education Cess on Exported Goods in Central Excise Matter — Education Cess Held to Be Part of Excise Duty for Rebate Purposes Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 37B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

29 Apr 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by M/s Ispat Industries Limited challenging an order dated 30 November 2004 passed by the Deputy Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)