Search Results for "Arrest without identification"

351 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Medical Evidence and Inconsistent Identification. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Rahul Rajabhau Pistulkar and Aditya @ Shubham Yevale, under the Protection of Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Six Accused in Brutal Dacoity, Murder, and Gang Rape Case. The court restored the death penalty for all six accused, reversing the High Court's reduction of sentence for three of them, based on the 'rarest of rare' doctrine.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from a brutal home invasion and massacre that occurred on the night of June 5-6, 2003, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Transfers Investigation of Custodial Murder to CBI and Directs Registration of FIR Against Police Officers. The court found that the victim died due to injuries sustained while in police custody and that the investigation by CID was not impartial, warranting transfer to CBI.

The petitioners, wife, father, and brother of the deceased Shaikh Muhammed Shaikh Rustam, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investiga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Appellants for Gang Rape Under Section 376D IPC — Sentence of 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment Confirmed. Testimony of Minor Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Minor Inconsistencies.

The appellants, Vinod Baku Jadhao and Sunil Raju Jadhao, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for the offence of gang rape under Section 376D o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Against Police for Illegal Detention and Demanding Bribe. Court holds that arrest without following procedure and detention without production before Magistrate violates Article 21 and Section 57 CrPC.

The petitioners, Rafiq s/o Madar Gowli and Faruq s/o Madar Gowli, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Condemns Police for Illegal Detention of Senior Citizens in Domestic Violence Case — Violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India. Police Detention of Senior Citizens Without Warrant Held Unconstitutional Under Article 21.

The Bombay High Court dealt with a criminal writ petition filed by five petitioners, including Niraj Ramesh Jariwala, his parents (Ramesh Vitthaldas J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention by Police Officers. False Case Under Bombay Police Act Resulted in Discharge, but Court Found No Malafide Intent or Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Miss Veena Sippy, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, alleging...