Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Lottery Ticket Commission TDS Case — Difference Between Face Value and Sale Price Not 'Commission' Under Section 194G of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that trade discount given to agents/dealers for encouraging sale of lottery tickets does not amount to commission requiring tax deduction at source, and thus no liability under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) arises.

9 Apr 2026

The case involves a tax dispute between the Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore (petitioner) and M/s Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd (respondent/assess...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Holder Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Continuous Readiness and Willingness Must Be Established Throughout the Period of Contract Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

11 Feb 2026

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.06.2006. The plaintiff, T.K.Kandhaswamy, sought to enforce the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Due to Discrepancies in Evidence and Failure to Examine Attesting Witnesses. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove execution of the agreement under Section 68 of the Evidence Act and readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, reversing the lower appellate court's decree.

11 Dec 2025

The present appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 12-12-1994 filed by the original plaintiff (since decease...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

21 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

Tribunals

NCLAT Upholds Sale of Corporate Debtor as Going Concern in Liquidation — Confirms Immunity Under Section 32A IBC. Liquidator's Application for Confirmation of Sale and Immunity Allowed Despite Objections from Suspended Directors.

27 Sep 2024

The appeal arose from a common order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the NCLT, Chennai, in IA(IBC)/415/2024, IA(IBC)/1701/2023, and IA(IBC)/1757/2023 in th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Eviction Decree in Rent Act Case — Concurrent Findings of Default in Payment of Rent and Subletting Not Interfered With Under Article 227. The court upheld the eviction decree under Section 15(1) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on concurrent findings of default and subletting.

23 Mar 2021

The petitioners, Tanzeem Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui and Nausheen Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Supplier by Central Bank of India for Non-Supply Due to Force Majeure. Natural Calamity in Thailand Constitutes Force Majeure Excusing Performance Under Contract Law Principles.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Acer India (Pvt.) Ltd., a private limited company engaged in supplying computer software and hardware, challenged its blacklistin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Co-owners Not Necessary Parties as They Claim Through Same Title as Defendants. The court held that under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, petitioners claiming to be co-owners are not necessary or proper parties to a suit for specific performance when they claim through the same title as existing defendants.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Natasha Dilip Singh and Dilip Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale Despite Fragmentation Act Restrictions — Condition Precedent of Obtaining Permission Not Fulfilled by Vendor. Vendor's Failure to Obtain Permission Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation Holdings Act, 1947 Does Not Bar Specific Performance When Purchaser is Ready and Willing.

29 Nov 2012

The appellant, Shantaram Babu Longale, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 71 of 1981 against the respondents for specific performance of an agreement for sa...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)