Search Results for "single transaction rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1677 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1677 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Appeals from Single Judge's Interim Orders in Share Control Dispute. Appeals Concern Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Injunctions, and Corporate Governance Interim Measures.

1 Sep 2010

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard four appeals arising from a common order dated 26-03-2003 passed by a Single Judge in two suits concernin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka [Outcome Not Available] in Criminal Petition to Quash FIR Under Sections 406, 417, 418, 420, 465 Indian Penal Code, Involving Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Court Examined Whether Allegations Constituted Criminal Offences or Mere Civil Breach, Emphasizing Need for Dishonest Intention at Inception for Cheating.

3 Feb 2020

The matter involved a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash FIR No. 168/2018 registered at Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Scope of Order XLI Rule 22 CPC in Second Appeal. Conditional Readiness to Perform Contract Held Not Sufficient; Respondent Cannot Challenge Adverse Finding Without Cross-Objection.

23 Feb 2005

The case originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 17 August 1973 concerning immovable property. The plaintiff, V...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

3 Nov 2014

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2024

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Agricultural Land Held Valid and Enforceable Despite Non-Registration of Power of Attorney.

16 Apr 2024

The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff, Hiren Veni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Reference in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Dealership Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. The court held that the trial court erred in rejecting the Section 8 application by examining the scope of the arbitration clause, as the bank guarantee was a security under the dealership agreement and the dispute was covered by the arbitration agreement.

11 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Escorts Limited (defendant No.1), filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order of the 3rd Joint C.J.S.D., Aurangabad, date...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)