Search Results for "permissive use"

228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case — Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored. Relationship of Landlord and Tenant Established Through Circumstantial Evidence and Tenant's Failure to Prove Adverse Possession.

The dispute pertains to two shop rooms in Berhampur, Orissa, originally owned by Smt. Ashalata Devi. The plaintiff claimed to be her adopted son and i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Upheld. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of fact regarding title and possession.

The appellant, Somayya Belchada, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Title to Property — Decree of Specific Performance Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The appellant, The Pashmina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers — Sets Aside Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Adverse Possession Against Co-Owner Brother.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 07.11.2007 in O.S.No.3163/1990 passed by the XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Remand Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order 1 Rule 8 CPC. The appellate court's remand for public notice under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC was held erroneous as the suit was for individual rights, not representative capacity.

The case involves a Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and dec...