Search Results for "ownership evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3108 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law.

27 Aug 2020

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nad...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Injunction Against Obstruction of Possession. The Court held that the first appellate court's concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as no substantial question of law arose.

16 Apr 2024

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (defendants) and the respondents (plaintiffs) over a shop named 'Sadhana Stores' and adjac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Order Granting Injunction in Property Dispute — Held That Trial Court's Refusal of Injunction Was Correct as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Ownership Over Disputed D.P. Road Area.

24 Jan 2023

The present writ petition was filed by the defendants (petitioners) challenging the judgment and order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the learned District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner’s Sanction for Sale of Trust Property. Court’s Determination Not Included in the Provided Judgment Fragment.

11 Dec 2019

The matter arose from an application filed by the trustees of a registered public trust before the Charity Commissioner seeking prior sanction for sal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Registration of Transfer of Shares. Held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding membership and transfer of shares, and that the society's bye-law amendment requiring prior approval for transfer of shares is valid.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court. The first petition (Writ Petition No. 9116 of 2013) was filed by Farhat Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.

20 Sep 2022

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)