High Court of Judicature at Bombay Admits Multiple Writ Petitions and Issues Rule — Petitioners seek legal remedy against respondents in civil dispute.
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "mutual legal assistance"
452 result(s) found
Found 452 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.
6 Feb 2015The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.
23 Aug 2013The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Bombay Disposes of Two Public Interest Litigations Challenging Joint Venture Agreement for Transfer of 20 Acres of Land at Film City, Goregaon. The Court Decided the Common Challenge to the Agreement in Both Petitions, Leaving Other Reliefs for Separate Adjudication.
9 Feb 2012The High Court of Bombay heard two public interest litigations filed by different sets of petitioners, both challenging the actions of the Maharashtra...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Village Recognition Dispute — Inter-District Boundary Dispute Not a Valid Ground to Keep Recognition in Abeyance. Formal recognition of a village cannot be withheld indefinitely pending resolution of an inter-district boundary dispute where the village has fulfilled all other criteria under the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 and O.M. dated 01.10.2005.
23 May 2025The dispute pertains to the recognition of a village in Nagaland. The appellant, Old Jalukai Village Council, opposed the recognition of respondent no...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...
- 234
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Educational Society Against Labour Court Orders Granting Compensation to Workman. Employer's failure to prove abandonment of service and non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 leads to reinstatement with back wages.
2 Jun 2017The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and its affiliated college, C.B. Kore Polytechnic, filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Ad...
- 109
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Murder Case, Upholding Conviction of One Accused and Acquitting Others for Lack of Common Intention. The court held that common intention under Section 34 IPC requires prior concert, which was absent for appellants whose roles were limited to holding and pulling the deceased, not participating in the fatal assault.
16 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a murder conviction where Krishnamurthy, Gopala, and Thimmappa were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, among ...
- 244
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Banking Investment Dispute - Failure of Respondent to Nominate Arbitrator Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of an Agreement dated 18th April, 2018 and Deed of Guarantee dated 18th April, 2018, as the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator.
17 Jul 2023The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a public company and banking company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concili...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds SEBI's Power to Regulate Fee Structure of Investment Advisors — Amendment Regulations and Circular Held Valid. Regulation 15A of SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 and Circular dated 23.09.2020 are within SEBI's delegated legislative competence and do not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
18 Jun 2021The petitioner, Purnartha Investment Advisers Private Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Regulation 3(XII) of the Securities and Excha...
- 65
