Search Results for "mandatory examination"

2936 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2936 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.

The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 308 OF 2006

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 27-02-2006 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli in Special Case (NDPS) No. 3/2005, convicting the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...