Search Results for "leasehold rights"

363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Sets Aside Dismissal for Default and Restores Suit on Condition of Costs. Advocate's Mistake in Noting Date Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 20/12/2023 passed by the City Civil Court, Dadri, dismissing the appellants' (original plaintiffs') suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Stall Licence Under APMC Act — Violation of Natural Justice. Joint Director's Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing Before Cancellation of Licence Under Section 52B of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Ravindra Arvind Bande, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 14 Jan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Held That Acquisition for Housing and Rationing Offices Serves Public Purpose and Compensation Determined Under Act Is Adequate.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. and Express Newspapers Ltd. challenging the acquisition of their land by...