Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024

19 Jun 2025

...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Section 95 Application Against Personal Guarantors in IBC Case — Limitation Period for Filing Application Under Section 95 Commences from Date of Default in Demand Notice Under Guarantee Contract, Not from Date of NCLT Order Admitting Corporate Debtor. The court held that the limitation for filing an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against a personal guarantor runs from the date of default in the demand notice under the guarantee contract, and not from the date of the NCLT order admitting the corporate debtor.

22 Oct 2024

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai, by a common judgment dated 22.10.2024, allowed two appeals filed by the State Bank of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Control Act. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment and Subletting Justify Eviction Under Sections 22(a) and 22(b)(i) and (ii) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

1 Feb 2018

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased tenant Gurudas Narayan Salgaonkar, challenged an order dated 03/01/2014 passed by the Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses Remand Order and Upholds Ex Parte Decree in Tenancy Suit Due to Unsubstantiated Fraud Allegations and Inordinate Delay. The Court found that the defendant had opportunity to defend, delay of 31 years was unjustified, and failure to produce sale deed warranted adverse inference under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

10 Apr 2026

The dispute originated from a suit filed under Section 88 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, by the appellant's mother on behalf of her minor son, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant to Examine Stamp Vendor in Eviction Suit — Rejection of Witness Summons Set Aside. The Court held that the requirement of filing a list of witnesses under Order XVI CPC is directory, not mandatory, and the Trial Court has discretion to permit examination of a witness essential for just adjudication.

5 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Rajendra Mohanlal Rathi, was the original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 123/2005 filed by the respondents for eviction and posse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Reduction of Debarment Period of Contractor by MCGM. Orders Reducing Debarment Alleged to be Without Authority and Vitiated by Mala Fides to Favour Contractor in Tender for Solid Waste Transportation.

21 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)