Search Results for "condonation of delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "condonation of delay"

612 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 612 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Review Petition by Zilla Parishad — Unexplained Delay of 3 Years and 3 Months Not Condonable. Local Self-Government's Clumsy Decision-Making Process Not Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.

20 Nov 2025

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Education Officer (Primary), and Chief Account Officer of Zilla Parish...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Condonation of Delay in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Liberal Approach Justified by Sufficient Cause and Prejudice Avoidance. The court held that the Trial Court's discretion to condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Order IX Rule 13 CPC, was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 115 CPC.

18 Nov 2025

The case arises from a partition suit filed by Hiraman Nivrutti Tupe (Applicant No.1) against his father, mother, and brothers, including Ratan Nivrut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Criminal Revision Against Process Issuance — Petitioner Pursued Wrong Remedy Under Section 227 CrPC. The court held that pursuing a wrong remedy constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and the revision should be heard on merits.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Ankit Padhye, challenged an order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Special Court for Differently-able Persons, Senior Citizens and Margi...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Act Case — Delay Condoned and Amount Deposited. The Commission held that an appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against orders passed by the State Commission in execution proceedings.

11 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Subhash Chandra Singh against M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. under Section 72 of the Consumer Prote...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal by Condoning Delay and Remands to State Commission for Limited Review on Compensation. Appellant consented to replace defective monitor, limiting State Commission's review to compensation and litigation costs only.

18 Jul 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard a second appeal filed by Dell International Service India Ltd against the order of t...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Consumer Dispute — Appellant Failed to Appear Despite Multiple Calls. Non-Appearance Indicates Lack of Interest in Pursuing the Matter Under Section 72 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

16 Jul 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard an appeal execution (AE No. 31/2025) filed by Malvinder Singh against Unicity Projec...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Builder's Appeal Against Execution Order in Consumer Dispute — Upholds State Commission's Order for Possession and Compensation. Builder's Appeal Challenging Execution of Final Order Dismissed for Lack of Merit and Non-Compliance with Earlier Directions.

9 May 2025

The case arises from a consumer complaint filed by Mr. Arunkumar Marimuthu (Respondent No.1) against M/s GM Infinite Dwelling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and it...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal on Execution in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession of Real Estate Unit. State Commission's Order Dismissing Execution Application Upheld as No Grounds for Interference Made Out.

9 May 2025

The case involves an appeal on execution filed by Shellender Singh under Section 27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging School Tribunal Order Dismissing Appeals as Time-Barred. Limitation period for filing appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is 30 days, but the Tribunal has discretion to condone delay for sufficient cause.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to five writ petitions filed by teachers (Sudhakar Shyamraoji Choudhari, Mahendra Nanaji Moon, Moreshwar Gulabrao Pohare, Prakas...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)