Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

951 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 951 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition for Karwar Port Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession.

11 Apr 2019

The petitioners, fishermen residing in Goudawada, Baitkhol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts in Challenge Based on Repugnancy to Central Act of 2013. Presidential Assent Under Article 254(2) Protects State Enactments from Being Void Despite Repugnancy to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 May 2023

The case involves a challenge to the validity of three Tamil Nadu State Acts: the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under MRTP Act and 2013 Act. Land Acquisition Officer's Communication Declaring Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Challenged Alongside Claim for Reservation Lapse Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

28 Oct 2021

The dispute concerned land bearing Survey No.94 at Chikhali, Taluka and District Nagpur, admeasuring about 9.56 acres, owned by the land owners (petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Refer Dispute Under Section 64 of Land Acquisition Act. Competent Authority Directed to Refer Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation to Arbitrator Under Section 51 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Gandharva Dhaneshwar Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 January 2024 passed by the Deputy Collector (Rehabili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim as Time-Barred Due to 37-Year Delay. Challenge to Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Rejected for Unexplained Laches.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Babasaheb Eknath Wakchaure, Sunil Namdeo Wakchaure, and Balasaheb Gangadhar Wakchaure, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.

9 Jul 2015

The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

15 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of Land Acquisition Authority Setting Aside Reference Orders as Ex-parte. Acquiring Body's Appearance and Filing of Written Statement and Evidence Rendered Reference Orders Not Ex-parte, Contravening Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

19 Dec 2022

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of eleven writ petitions filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Planning Authority Can Compel Landowner to Accept Transferable Development Rights Instead of Monetary Compensation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Division Bench Examines the Interplay of Sections 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Where a Landowner Served a Purchase Notice After Reservation Not Acquired Within Ten Years and the Planning Authority Offered TDR as Compensation.

16 Sep 2021

The petitioner, a landowner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that her land reserved in the Developme...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)