KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "compensation exemption"
444 result(s) found
Found 444 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.
14 Jun 2011The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.
4 Mar 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...
- 791
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Feb 2020The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...
- 97
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.
10 Jan 2025The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.
31 Jan 2011The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.
14 Nov 2019The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...
- 557
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.
24 Sep 2025The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 20
