Search Results for "Unjust gain"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Unjust gain"

206 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society — Additional FSI Rights Not a Bar to Conveyance Under MOFA. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to entertain a second application for deemed conveyance after rejection of the first, and the developer's claim over additional FSI does not prevent conveyance of land to the society.

17 Jul 2026

The Petitioner, Ariisto Realtors Private Limited, a developer, challenged an order dated 14 July 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-oper...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions by Judicial Officers Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Payments. Petitions Seek to Quash Show Cause Notices Issued by District Authorities and Refund of Amounts Already Recovered.

9 Jul 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents

9 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Condonation of Delay in Consumer Complaint Under Article 227 — Liberal Approach Required When Complaint Was Filed Before Wrong Forum Due to Jurisdictional Error. The court held that the period spent before the wrong forum must be excluded and a liberal approach is warranted in consumer matters.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Godrej Projects Development Ltd., challenged an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, which dismisse...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes TNPSC Show Cause Notices for Lack of Jurisdiction in Caste Certificate Verification — University, Not TNPSC, Is Competent Authority Under G.O.Ms.No.100

29 Jun 2026

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who were selected by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) for various post...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

9 Sep 2015

The case pertains to an incident where the deceased was allegedly assaulted by a group of persons, resulting in his death. The appellants, along with ...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

9 Sep 2015

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants (accused nos. 1 and 5 in some appeals, and accused no. 2 in another) by the Fa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Interest Dispute — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable from Date of Possession, Not Notification Under Section 4(1). The court clarified that Section 28 explicitly provides for interest from the date of possession, and the executing court's contrary view was erroneous.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioners, M.V. Subba Rao and M.M.G. Prasad, were owners of land in Singapore Village, Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District, which was acquired fo...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

1 Jan 1970

...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)