Search Results for "Section 28(1)"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Media Company in Cable TV Act Offences Following Decriminalization. Cognizance Taken Under Section 5/16 of Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 Set Aside as Amendment Removed Criminal Penalty, Making Offence Civil.

The petitioners, a television news company and its correspondents, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal by Appellant Against Order Rejecting Return of Plaint Application -- Maintainability Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and CPC -- Jurisdiction Dispute in Commercial Suit

The High Court dismissed a commercial appeal filed against an order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC seeking return of plaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Concerning Cooperative Society Election Dispute; Specific Holding Not Mentioned in Extracted Text. Petitioner Challenged Actions of Cooperative Election Authorities in Relation to Taklibhan Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.

The extracted text from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, consists only of the cause title, case number, party array, and citation for Writ Pet...