Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under the BDA Act and the Land Acquisition Act.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, presided...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Writ Appeal by Government Survey Employees. Appeal Pertains to Service Dispute Arising from Single Judge Order in WA No. 1267 of 2014 (S-RES).

30 May 2024

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Common Order Upholding Land Acquisition for Inner Ring Road Project — No Error Apparent on Record Found. The court held that review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited and the applicants failed to demonstrate any manifest error in the original order dismissing writ petitions on the ground of alternative remedy under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

9 Jan 2026

The judgment pertains to a batch of review applications filed against a common order dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.No.7735 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jun 2019

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Promotion Denial in Bharat Electronics Limited — Petitioner Failed to Establish Arbitrariness in Non-Promotion to E-VI Grade. The court held that the denial of promotion was based on the petitioner's failure to meet the benchmark criteria and the decision of the Departmental Promotion Committee, which was not shown to be arbitrary or mala fide.

3 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Veeramani Shastri, an employee of Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

High Court of Madras Reviews Review Applications in Co-operative Sugar Mill Cases. No Substantive Judgment Text Available for Further Extraction.

28 Mar 2025

No substantive judgment text provided; only case details are available. The case involves a batch of review applications by multiple individuals again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

27 Sep 2013

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)