WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Regularization"
662 result(s) found
Found 662 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Co-operative Society Challenging Industrial Court Order on Interim Relief in Service Dispute. Court holds that the Industrial Court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interim relief without considering the maintainability of the complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
5 Jan 2024The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., a federal co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-opera...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Termination Orders in Service Disputes for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Termination of services without inquiry or opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice, leading to reinstatement with 50% back wages.
11 Apr 2023The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees of the Sales Tax Department, Maharashtra, challenging termination orders. The first petiti...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Plan Sanction by Nagpur Improvement Trust Due to PIL Prohibitory Order. Court Directs NIT to Consider Application on Merits Without Reference to PIL Order, Holding That Prohibitory Order Does Not Create Absolute Bar.
14 Feb 2023The petitioners, Kartiki Jagdish Pawar and Sanjyoti Jagdish Pawar, purchased a plot in Nagpur from Dashrath Balaji Kalambe, who had originally bought ...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Shikshan Sevaks Under M.E.P.S. Act — Termination Upheld as Automatic Upon Completion of Three-Year Tenure Without Requisite Qualification. The court held that the termination of Shikshan Sevaks who failed to acquire the prescribed qualification within three years is automatic by operation of law under Section 5 of the M.E.P.S. Act and Rule 9(8)(a) of the M.E.P.S. Rules, and no separate termination order is required.
21 Sep 2022The petitioners, members of Swabhimani Shikshak Va Shikshaketar Sanghatana and other individuals, were appointed as Shikshan Sevaks (probationary teac...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Contractual Staff Nurses and Community Health Officers Seeking Regularization of Services. Court directs State to consider regularization in accordance with policy and law, holding that temporary employees cannot be continued indefinitely without regularization.
5 Aug 2022The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Seema Shivaji Jaybhaye, a Staff Nurse on contract basis at Covid-19 Hospital, Jalna, and Sapna Dilip...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.
28 Jul 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...
- 191
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Regularize Casual Workers in Border Roads Organization. Court Holds That Framing of Schemes Is Government's Prerogative and High Court Exceeded Its Powers Under Article 226.
15 Mar 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court, which had directed the regulariza...
- 254
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Forest Development Corporation Case — Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Invalid Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's failure to conduct proper inquiry and denial of opportunity to lead evidence renders termination illegal, warranting reinstatement with back wages.
27 Sep 2011The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM) challenging the orders of the Labour Co...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
6 Jul 2010The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...
- 33
