Bombay High Court Quashes Termination Orders in Service Disputes for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Termination of services without inquiry or opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice, leading to reinstatement with 50% back wages.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees of the Sales Tax Department, Maharashtra, challenging termination orders. The first petitioner, Madhavsing Shivsing Bainade, a peon, challenged the order dated 22.1.1998 terminating his services and the subsequent order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) dated 21.2.2007 dismissing his Original Application. The second petitioner, Miss Shamsunnisa Basiroddin, a clerk-cum-typist, challenged the order dated 5.2.1997 terminating her services. Both petitioners contended that their services were terminated without any inquiry and without affording them an opportunity of hearing, in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, represented by the State, did not dispute the lack of inquiry. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the termination orders were passed without any inquiry or opportunity of hearing, which is a clear violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the termination orders and the MAT order, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service and 50% back wages. The court also directed that the petitioners be deemed to be in service for all purposes except for the remaining 50% back wages.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination - Natural Justice - Termination of services without holding any inquiry and without affording opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice - The impugned orders dated 22.1.1998 and 5.2.1997 terminating the services of the petitioners were set aside as they were passed without any inquiry or opportunity of hearing - Held that such termination orders are unsustainable in law (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination orders passed against the petitioners without holding any inquiry and without affording an opportunity of hearing are sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the termination orders dated 22.1.1998 and 5.2.1997, and the MAT order dated 21.2.2007. Directed reinstatement of petitioners with continuity of service and 50% back wages. Petitioners deemed in service for all purposes except remaining 50% back wages.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Termination without inquiry
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Service law
  • Writ jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 23

Writ Petition No.1851 of 2007 and Writ Petition No.1935 of 2007

2023-04-11

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Mr S. D. Joshi, Mr S. S. Kazi, Mr S. G. Karlekar

Madhavsing s/o Shivsing Bainade and Miss. Shamsunnisa Basiroddin

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service dispute challenging termination orders

Remedy Sought

Quashing of termination orders and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages

Filing Reason

Termination of services without inquiry or opportunity of hearing

Previous Decisions

MAT Aurangabad dismissed O.A. No.800 of 1998 on 21.2.2007 confirming termination order

Issues

Whether termination orders without inquiry and opportunity of hearing are valid Whether petitioners are entitled to reinstatement and back wages

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that termination was without any inquiry or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice Respondents did not dispute the lack of inquiry

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of services without holding any inquiry and without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

In the first petition i.e. Writ Petition No.1851/2007, the Petitioner has put forth his prayers at clauses (B) to (E)... In the second petition i.e. Writ Petition No.1935/2007, the Petitioner has put forth her prayers at clauses (B), (C), (C-1), (C-2), (D) and (E)...

Procedural History

Writ Petition No.1851/2007 filed challenging termination order dated 22.1.1998 and MAT order dated 21.2.2007. Writ Petition No.1935/2007 filed challenging termination order dated 5.2.1997. Both petitions heard together and disposed of by common judgment on 11.4.2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Termination Orders in Service Disputes for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Termination of services without inquiry or opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice, leading to reinstatement with 50% back...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Sec...