Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order for Enquiry Under Section 59(b) of MLRC. Sale of Watan Land After Re-grant on Old Tenure Requires Enquiry Regarding Permission Under Circular Dated 13 November 1979.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners, Vishwanath Sahadu Wakhare and others, against an order dated 11 December 2020 passed by the Hon'ble ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Protection of Grazing Land and Water Pond for Village Cattle. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Public Duty, and the Dispute Appears to Be Private in Nature.

The petitioner, a farmer, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the State authorities to permit the use of land (new Gut No.38 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal on Section 9A CPC Issue Concerning Land Rights. Court Considers Whether Trial Court Must Decide Jurisdiction Application Before Interim Relief in Suit Involving Salsette Act and Land Revenue Code.

The appeals from order were heard finally at admission stage on a preliminary issue raised by the appellant under Section 9A of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Demonstrate Financial Capacity and Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness.

The appellant, Jayantilal Devji Shah, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of agricultural land against the respondents. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Appeal — Refuses Temporary Injunction Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case. Mere Registration of Patent Does Not Establish Validity; Plaintiff Must Show Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Injunction.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and a cross-appeal arising from a suit for patent infringement. The appellant/plaintiff, a patent holder, fi...