High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Cooperative Housing Societies. Petitioners Challenge Orders of Cooperative Authorities Allegedly Favoring Developer.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Co-operative Societies"
1250 result(s) found
Found 1250 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Election of Directors to Cooperative Bank Board. Minister's Order Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Valid and Election Process Not Vitiated by Irregularities.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by individuals challenging the election of directors to the Yavatmal District Central Cooper...
- 192
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Demolition of Unauthorized Terrace Construction in Cooperative Housing Society. Lease of Terrace by Member Without Society's Consent Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
22 Jan 2015The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a dispute between N. Jethani (petitioner in WP 5476/1990) and Shri Shivaji Cooperative Housing S...
- 241
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Society Members Against Unauthorized Construction and Demolition by Developer. Members have locus standi to challenge illegal construction; administrator must act lawfully.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, who are members of the Linking Road Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the unauthorized construction and demo...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Cooperative Society Election — Procedural Irregularity in Returning Officer's Decision. Failure to Provide Reasons and Opportunity to Cure Defect Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
16 Dec 2025The petitioner, Banganga Anurag Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Developer Directed to Pay Occupation Charges and Hand Over Possession of Amenity Space. Society's claim for amenity space upheld under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and Development Control Regulations.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Shivraj Nagar Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition against the developer, M/s. Mexttech Realty ...
- 192
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Dispute Over Exhausted FSI and Conveyance Rights. Prima Facie, Developer's Attempt to Use TDR for Further Construction on Sector IV-A After Exhausting Consumable FSI Violates Cooperative Housing Societies' Right to Conveyance.
15 Apr 2015The Bombay High Court dealt with cross-appeals arising from an interim injunction granted in a suit filed by cooperative housing societies against the...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Fresh Voter List Cut-off Date in Cooperative Elections. The Court upheld the validity of a new cut-off date prescribed by the State Cooperative Election Authority under Sections 27(3A) and 73CB of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, holding that since the final voters list had not been declared, the authority could initiate a fresh cut-off date.
30 Jan 2024Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.
23 Jan 2019The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...
- 222
High Court
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench Considers Maintainability of Writ Petition in Face of Alternate Remedy Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The appeal challenges interim order granting stay on recovery proceedings, with appellants arguing that the writ petition should not have been entertained due to availability of alternate statutory remedy.
29 Oct 2010This Letters Patent Appeal arose from an interim order dated 8 September 2009 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 2...
- 39
