Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and bail status, vitiating the preventive detention order.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz @ Babali Makbul Khan, challenged the detention order dated 6th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates of all injured persons in a solitary incident vitiates subjective satisfaction of detaining authority.

The petitioner, Monty Bahadur Karotiya, challenged his detention order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay of 5 Months. Failure to Comply with Section 3(3) Requirement of Forthwith Approval and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Sachin Parshuram Mane, challenged an order of detention dated 30.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed by Delayed Consideration of Detenue's Representation.

The petitioner, sister of the detenue Illiyas Gulab Shaikh, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 22.06.2020 passed by the Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act — Activities Relate to Law and Order, Not Public Order. Personal Dispute Between Co-Residents Does Not Affect Public Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Asif Abdul Ahad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 30 July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention o...