Search Results for "Heavy Engineering case"

410 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 410 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Army Major's Resignation in Writ Petition Under Article 226 — Rejection Set Aside as Arbitrary. Right to Resign Must Be Considered Reasonably with Disclosure of Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Major Yogesh Chandra Madhav Sayanakar and Ms. Shruti Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Upheld. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (M/s New Shelter Enterprises and its proprietors) challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 20304 OF 2019

The petitioners, engineering graduates from universities other than the University of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019

The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...