Search Results for "Disposal"

10707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Release of Juvenile in Murder Case After Determining Juvenility Under Juvenile Justice Act. Benefit of Juvenility Claimed After Final Disposal of Case as Age Below 18 Years at Time of Offence Was Established.

The petitioner was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of Amir Ullah on 18th February 1979 at Firozabad, Uttar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Inam Land Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Succeeds as Plaintiffs Prove Their Father Was Granted Inam Land and They Are in Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...