Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Developer Appointment"

320 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

30 Oct 2014

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Despite Pending CIRP Under IBC — Section 14 IBC Does Not Bar Competent Authority from Exercising Jurisdiction Under Section 11(3) MOFA. The Court held that the statutory right of flat purchasers to obtain deemed conveyance under MOFA cannot be defeated by the pendency of insolvency proceedings against the promoter.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Darshan Mandir Co-operative Housing Society Limited, is a cooperative housing society formed by purchasers of flats in a building cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to RERA Refund Order Alleged Void for Want of Jurisdiction. The Petition Tests Whether Supreme Court's Newtech Decision Renders Final Unappealed RERA Orders Non-Est Under Section 71 of RERA Act.

7 Apr 2026

The writ petition came before the Bombay High Court raising the issue whether an order passed by the RERA Adjudicating Officer directing refund of Rs....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.

13 Dec 2023

The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Appeal Against Order Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Not Maintainable Under Commercial Courts Act. The court held that the remedy of appeal against an order under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies under Section 37 of that Act, and not under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

11 Feb 2021

The case involves an appeal filed under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking De-Registration of Cooperative Housing Society Registered 45 Years Ago. Court holds that post-registration events cannot be grounds for de-registration under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves a rather unusual circumstance where the director of the Petitioner-company has sued himself in connection with proceedings for de-re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.

5 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case — Lender Entitled to Interim Measures to Secure Repayment of Outstanding Amount. The court held that where a borrower defaults and the loan agreement provides for repossession, the lender is entitled to interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including appointment of receiver and injunction to prevent alienation of assets.

18 Dec 2013

The petitioner, L & T Finance Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures agains...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)