Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Refund Claim Without Challenging Nil Assessment Order in Customs Duty Case. Assessee Entitled to Refund of Excess Duty Paid Under Provisional Assessment Despite Nil Assessment Order.

3 Mar 2015

The case involves an appeal by Sesa Goa Ltd against the Commissioner of Customs, Panaji Minor Port, regarding a refund claim for excess customs duty p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Excise Department’s Appeals Against CESTAT Order Remanding Cases for Denial of Natural Justice. Court Holds That Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents to Assessee Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Despite Department’s Claim of Assessee’s Delaying Tactics.

12 Jun 2019

The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed a batch of seven Excise Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, against a common...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

24 Apr 2013

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Broker License Suspension Case — Prohibition Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Restoring Customs Broker License Upheld as Show Cause Notice and Hearing Were Not Provided Before Issuing Prohibition Orders Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962.

12 Jan 2022

The Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore Division, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the Final Order No.A/20356/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order Dismissing ROM Application as Time-Barred. Time Limit Under Section 129B(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Applies Only to Suo Moto Rectification, Not to Applications Filed by Parties.

10 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Allied Fibers Ltd., imported capital goods between October 1994 and September 1995. A show cause notice was issued on 24.03.1998 d...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)