Search Results for "Article 16(3)"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Bail Application Involving Gaurav Arjun Patil. The Court Rules on Bail Sought Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, heard an application for bail filed by Gaurav Arjun Patil against the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975

The petitioners, former employees of BESCOM and KPTCL, retired from service between 2014 and 2016. After their retirement, disciplinary proceedings we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Smart City Project — No Material Irregularity Found in Evaluation Process. The court held that the deviations in the commercial bid were not material and the tender committee's decision was reasonable.

The petitioner, NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of Shivamogga Smart City Limited (respondent No.1) to award a tender to Bhar...