High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Additional Qualification"
1455 result(s) found
Found 1455 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds KAT Order Quashing Seniority List for Violation of Natural Justice in Government Teacher Promotions. The court held that altering seniority without notice to affected employees violates principles of natural justice and the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957.
30 Jul 2015The case involves a challenge to the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT) dated 03.12.2010, which quashed the seniority list of Assist...
- 56
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.
27 Jul 2023Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions in Inter Se Seniority and Head of School Appointment Dispute. Seniority determined by date of joining as Assistant Teacher, not by date of acquiring higher qualification.
23 Feb 2022The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Pandurang Kurhe and Namdeo Sase, both Assistant Teachers in a school run by Samta Shikshan Prasarak ...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 10% GATE Weightage in MSEDCL Recruitment — Condition Held Valid and Not Arbitrary. Court rules that awarding 10% weightage to GATE score for Graduate Engineer Trainee posts does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as it is a reasonable classification with nexus to the object of selecting meritorious candidates.
17 Mar 2025The petitioners, aspirants for the post of Graduate Engineer Trainee (Distribution) with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (...
- 622
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Education Officer's Seniority Determination — Appointment of Headmaster Set Aside for Violation of Seniority Rules. The court held that the Education Officer has jurisdiction to decide inter se seniority under Rule 3.1 of MEPS Rules, 1981, and that appointment of a junior teacher as Headmaster is illegal.
3 Mar 2023The petitioner, Namdeo Vishnu Sase, and respondent no. 5, Ramesh Mohaniraj Ghule, were teachers in a school run by respondent no. 4 management. The ma...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement of Untrained Teachers. Termination Held Illegal Under Section 5(2) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, as Management's Objections Were Technical and Unsubstantiated.
8 Apr 2010The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed by the management of a school challenging orders of the School ...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professors' Writ Petition for Time-Bound Promotion. Court holds that the benefit of time-bound promotion under Government Resolution dated 15-04-1999 is available from the date of initial appointment, and denial by management is arbitrary.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, ten Assistant Professors employed at Yeshwantrao Chavan Mahavidyalaya, Tuljapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...
- 89
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Ayurveda College to Continue PG Courses Despite Non-Compliance with New Regulations. Central Council's attempt to withdraw permission for PG courses due to non-compliance with 2016 Regulations fails as college had already admitted students under 2012 Regulations.
20 Apr 2022The case involves appeals by the Central Council for Indian Medicine against judgments of the Karnataka High Court that allowed writ petitions filed b...
- 146
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Council of Architecture's Authority Over AICTE in Architectural Education Matters — Conflict Between Two Regulatory Bodies Resolved in Favor of Special Statute. The Court held that the Architects Act, 1972, being a special statute, prevails over the general AICTE Act, 1987, in matters of approval and regulation of architectural institutions.
8 Nov 2019The case involves a conflict between two regulatory bodies: the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Council of Architecture (CoA...
- 209
