Search Results for "declaration void"

2773 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2773 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit. Defendant Failed to Disclose Triable Issue or Bona Fide Defence Under Order 37 CPC.

This Civil Revision Application was filed by the original respondent (defendant) against an order dated 23rd July 2009 passed by the learned Judge of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Provident Fund Nomination Dispute — Nominee Entitled to Receive Amount as Trustee for Heirs. Joint Nomination Creates Co-Trusteeship Under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952.

The appellant, Antonio Joao Fernandes, filed a suit claiming 50% of the provident fund amount of his deceased cousin Joazinho Dias, who had nominated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Non-Prosecution. Petitioner Failed to Appear or Take Steps to Prosecute the Petition, Leading to Dismissal.

The petitioner, Qader Khan s/o Ismail Khan, a resident of Parbhani district, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling Holdings) Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Tribunal's Finding That He Was a Non-Surplus Holder.

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Vaijoba Deshmukh, a resident of Lohgaon, Taluka and District Parbhani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Land Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 12(6) of the Act.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landholder Babasaheb Balwant Bawane, challenged the order dated 30th April 1993 passed by the Chairman, S...