SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008
21 Mar 2017...
Search Results for "written application"
11471 result(s) found
Found 11471 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.
24 Dec 2014The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Arbitration Act Case – Delhi Court Has Jurisdiction Over Section 20 Application. Application Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not an 'Application' Within Section 31(4) Barring Subsequent Section 20 Application.
22 Apr 1969The case concerned a dispute arising from a construction contract between the Union of India and the respondent, Surjeet Singh Atwal. The agreement, e...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Reopening of Evidence in Eviction Suit Due to Advocate's Absence and Denial of Opportunity to Defendant No.3. Court sets aside trial court order rejecting application to file examination-in-chief and cross-examine defendant no.3, holding that principles of natural justice were violated.
30 Jan 2018The petitioners, defendants in an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 24 August 2015 rejecting their applic...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
7 Jul 2026The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...
- 75
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.
13 Dec 2024The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Order Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Partition and Declaration. Trial Court Found No Cause of Action and Allowed Application Filed by Defendants 24 and 26; Appeal Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Triable Issues.
29 Jun 2026The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiffs against the order dated 14.10.2019...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.
11 Oct 2024The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...
- 1249
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.
9 Jul 2015The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtr...
- 91
