Search Results for "vexatious request"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit — Emphasizes Need for Brevity in Pleadings. The court allowed the defendants to defend the suit on condition of depositing a portion of the claimed amount, while deprecating prolix pleadings.

The applicant, JSW Steel Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against M/s. Paras Das Jain and Sons and two ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Revenue Circle Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Independent Panch Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajaram Banderao Kulkarni, was a Revenue Circle Officer at Pangari, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur. On 24 May 1994, the complainant (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Alleged Irregularities in BEML Limited. Court holds that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the petition was based on unsubstantiated allegations and media reports, not credible material.

The petitioner, Mr. K. Subramanyam Sastry, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the Cent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Prosecution. Court holds that dismissal of suit for default under Order IX Rule 8 CPC is not permissible when the plaintiff's counsel is absent but the defendant is present and ready to proceed.

The appellant, Prabhudayal Pande, filed a First Appeal against an order dated 14.8.2014 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nagpur, in Speci...