Search Results for "urban land tax"

501 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 501 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Quashing of Tax Assessment in Inter-State Gas Sale Dispute. State Imposed Tax on Sale of Natural Gas Extracted Under Production Sharing Contract, High Court Quashed Assessment and Directed Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard a group of civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, Luckno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act as Valid Classification Under Article 14. Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Control Protection as Religious Property Requires Summary Eviction Procedure to Prevent Maladministration.

The case involves an appeal by tenants occupying shops in Gurudwara Singh Sabha, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010022932010_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...