Search Results for "trademark"

241 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 241 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Pleading Practice in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — Single Injunction Prayer Sufficient. The court held that separate prayers for infringement and passing off are unnecessary; a single prayer for injunction suffices regardless of the ground.

This judgment arises from an interim application in a commercial IP suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Ltd against an opposing party. The court had alre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Court upholds Single Judge's order granting leave under Clause 14 of Letters Patent to combine passing off claim with infringement action despite territorial jurisdiction issues.

The case involves two appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.2727 of 2011. The appellant, Shree Sia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Architect Allowed Deduction Under Section 80O for Foreign Exchange Receipts. Architectural Designs Constitute Intellectual Property Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80O of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...