Madras High Court Reserved Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Under Article 226 Challenging Dismissal Orders. Petitioners from Various Town Panchayats Sought Quashing of Termination Orders and Reinstatement with Backwages.
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "suo motu initiation"
266 result(s) found
Found 266 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Perjury Proceedings in Civil Suit. Filing a false affidavit in a civil suit does not automatically constitute an offence under Section 199 IPC without proof of intent to cause injury and that the statement was made in a judicial proceeding.
5 Feb 2020The appellants, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Greater Mumbai against respondent...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Tenancy Dispute Involving Widow Tenant's Deemed Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Tenant's Failure to Exercise Option Under Section 32F After Widow's Death Precludes Automatic Purchase.
30 Nov 2012The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands at Wai under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. On the tillor's day (1.4.1957), ...
- 122
Tribunals
NCLAT Clarifies Certified Copy Requirement for Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The court held that an uncertified copy can be filed, but limitation runs from receipt of certified copy.
30 Nov -0001This judgment arises from a reference made to a single member bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai due to a dissent...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.
7 Mar 2011The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.
17 Feb 2026The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...
- 28
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Non-Prosecution. Petitioner Failed to Appear or Take Steps to Prosecute the Petition, Leading to Dismissal.
8 Mar 2011The petitioner, Qader Khan s/o Ismail Khan, a resident of Parbhani district, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
11 May 2026The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...
- 247
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.
17 Mar 2015The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...
- 70
