Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Perjury Proceedings in Civil Suit. Filing a false affidavit in a civil suit does not automatically constitute an offence under Section 199 IPC without proof of intent to cause injury and that the statement was made in a judicial proceeding.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Greater Mumbai against respondent No.1, M/s. Kishore Engineering Company, for recovery of Rs.75,600/- towards arrears of service charges. The appellants are legal heirs of the deceased proprietor of M/s. Union Commercial Corporation. During the suit, the appellants filed an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking initiation of criminal proceedings against respondents No.2 and 3 for allegedly filing a false affidavit, which they claimed constituted an offence under Section 199 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The learned City Civil Court Judge, by order dated 5th October 2018, rejected the application. Aggrieved, the appellants appealed under Section 341 CrPC to the Bombay High Court. The High Court examined the provisions of Sections 191, 193, and 199 IPC, and Section 340 CrPC. The court noted that for an offence under Section 199 IPC, the false statement must be made in a judicial proceeding with intent to cause injury. The court found that the affidavit in question was not made during a judicial proceeding but was filed in a civil suit, and there was no evidence of intent to cause injury. The court held that the trial judge's discretion in refusing to make a complaint was not perverse or unreasonable. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 341 - Appeal against order under Section 340 CrPC - The appeal is maintainable against an order refusing to make a complaint under Section 340 CrPC. (Para 1)

B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 199 - False statement made in a judicial proceeding - For an offence under Section 199 IPC, the false statement must be made during a judicial proceeding and with intent to cause injury to any person. A mere false affidavit in a civil suit does not automatically attract Section 199 IPC unless it is made in a proceeding and with the requisite intent. (Paras 10-12)

C) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 340 - Procedure for filing complaint for offences against public justice - The court must form a prima facie opinion that an offence has been committed and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to make a complaint. The court's discretion is not to be interfered with lightly. (Paras 8-9)

D) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 191 - Definition of false evidence - A person is said to give false evidence if he makes a false statement which he knows or believes to be false, and which is required by law to be made on oath. (Para 10)

E) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 193 - Punishment for false evidence - The punishment for intentionally giving false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding is imprisonment for up to seven years and fine. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants are entitled to file a complaint under Section 199 of the Indian Penal Code for perjury based on an affidavit filed in a civil suit, and whether the learned City Civil Court Judge erred in rejecting the application under Section 340 CrPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order dated 5th October 2018 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai in Notice of Motion No.823 of 2018 in Suit No.6117 of 2007 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Section 341 CrPC
  • Section 199 IPC
  • Section 195 CrPC
  • perjury
  • false affidavit
  • civil suit
  • criminal proceedings
  • judicial proceeding
  • intent to cause injury
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 63

Criminal Appeal No.153 of 2019

2020-02-05

Prithviraj K. Chavan

Mr. Abhinav Chandrachud a/w Mr. Naresh Ratnani i/b Ashwin Ankhad & Associates for Appellant; Mr. Ankit Lohia a/w Mr. Chetan R. Shah a/w Mr. Arun Mehta i/b Akshar Laws for Respondents No.2 and 3; Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P, for Respondent No.4-State

Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah

M/s. Kishore Engineering Company, Nak Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd., Mr. Himanshu Patwa, and The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 341 CrPC against order rejecting application under Section 340 CrPC for initiating criminal proceedings for perjury.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order dated 5th October 2018 and to direct the trial court to make a complaint under Section 340 CrPC against respondents No.2 and 3 for offences under Section 199 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellants alleged that respondents No.2 and 3 filed a false affidavit in the civil suit, which constituted perjury.

Previous Decisions

The learned City Civil Court Judge rejected the application under Section 340 CrPC on 5th October 2018.

Issues

Whether the affidavit filed by respondents No.2 and 3 in the civil suit constitutes an offence under Section 199 IPC? Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the application under Section 340 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the false affidavit was made with intent to cause injury and should be prosecuted under Section 199 IPC. Respondents No.2 and 3 argued that the affidavit was not made in a judicial proceeding and there was no intent to cause injury, and the trial court's discretion should not be interfered with.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 199 IPC, the false statement must be made in a judicial proceeding and with intent to cause injury. A mere false affidavit in a civil suit does not automatically attract Section 199 IPC. The trial court's discretion under Section 340 CrPC to refuse to make a complaint should not be interfered with unless it is perverse or unreasonable.

Judgment Excerpts

Feeling aggrieved with and dissatisfied by an order dated 5th October, 2018 passed in Notice of Motion No.823 of 2018 in Suit No.6117 of 2007 by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, the appellants have approached this Court under section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. For an offence under Section 199 IPC, the false statement must be made in a judicial proceeding and with intent to cause injury.

Procedural History

The appellants filed a civil suit in City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai. During the suit, they filed an application under Section 340 CrPC seeking criminal proceedings for perjury. The trial court rejected the application on 5th October 2018. The appellants appealed under Section 341 CrPC to the Bombay High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 5th February 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 340, 341
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 191, 193, 199
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Perjury Proceedings in Civil Suit. Filing a false affidavit in a civil suit does not automatically constitute an offence under Section 199 IPC without proof of intent to cause injury and ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Matter — No Interference with Possession Notice as Debtor Failed to Discharge Liability. Court Held That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Used to Circumv...