Search Results for "specific findings"

7375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Civil Revision Application in Eviction Proceeding under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Landlord's contention of alternate accommodation by tenant and willful default were key issues.

The dispute centered on a shop admeasuring 15' x 20' ft. out of House No.1270/6 at Gunj Golai, Latur, owned by the late Vishwambhar Kulkarni. After hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disciplinary Action in ONGC Tender Irregularity Case. Court upholds chargesheet, punishment order, and appellate order against employee for unauthorizedly constituting tender committee to favor L2 bidder.

The petitioner, R.P. Gautam, an employee of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...