Search Results for "special limitation"

3477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not a Valid Transfer of Title. Suit for possession based on agreement of sale dismissed as agreement does not confer ownership and suit is barred by limitation.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural land Survey No.22 (old) Gut No.11 admeasuring 6.44 acres at Mouza Savangi, Tahsil Kuhi, District Nagpur....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Suit. Held that the plaint discloses a cause of action and is not barred by limitation or res judicata under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Bhalchandra Shetye, was the original defendant no.1 in a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) seeking partit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...