Search Results for "section 202 inquiry"

677 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 677 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GULFISHA FATIMA

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision in Defamation Complaint, Sets Aside Remand Order. Rule of de novo trial not applicable to verification recording; order issuing process under Section 500 IPC restored.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M. H. Patel, the original complainant, against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheating and Forgery Case — Restores Magistrate's Order Issuing Process. Held that the Sessions Court erred in quashing process at the initial stage as there was a prima facie case under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 403 read with 120B IPC.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by the original complainant, Rajeev Sawhney, challenging an order dated 13.8.2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Process Issued by Chief Judicial Magistrate for Offences Under IPC. Court Holds That Contradictory Orders by Same Magistrate—Issuing Process on Private Complaint and Accepting 'B' Summary—Render the Prosecution Invalid.

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by applica...