Search Results for "section 2(14)"

821 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 821 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Orders in Section 9 Applications for Injunction in Water Supply Project Dispute. Court Examines Whether Injunction Preventing Contract Termination Amounts to Impermissible Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The matter involved two arbitration appeals arising from interim applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.

The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Allowing Union to Lead Evidence in Recognition Dispute. The Court held that the Industrial Court has discretion to permit additional evidence at any stage to effectuate the purpose of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a recognized trade union of employees of Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Pune,...