High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"
1175 result(s) found
Found 1175 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of ICADR Arbitral Orders in Private Road Concession Dispute. Core issue involves whether arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and ICADR Rules can be overridden by the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.
26 Jul 2026The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 13415 of 2025, challenging the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's judgmen...
- 13
High Court
High Court Quashes Municipal Notice for Trade Licence on Cinema Exhibition Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. Cinema Exhibition Held Exclusively Regulated by Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, Not Subject to Municipal Trade Licence Under Section 256 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.
5 Feb 2026The dispute originated from a notice issued by the Chief Officer of the City Municipal Council, Chintamani, directing the petitioners, and its proprie...
- 257
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.
23 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...
- 693
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.
23 Dec 2025This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Distribution Licensee's Right to Levy Wheeling Charges on 110 kV Feeders — 110 kV HPCL Feeders Held Integral Part of Distribution Network Despite Voltage Level. The Court held that the functional use of the feeders for distribution to a single consumer, HPCL, determines their classification as distribution assets, not merely the voltage level under CEA Regulations, 2010.
3 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between Sai Wardha Power Generation Limited (SWPGL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) on one side, and Ta...
- 175
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Bona Fides of Insolvency Proceedings by Telecom Service Providers to Avoid AGR Dues. The Court held that no fresh dispute on AGR dues can be raised after final judgment and that spectrum cannot be subject of IBC proceedings.
20 Jul 2020The Supreme Court was hearing miscellaneous applications in the ongoing litigation concerning the definition of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) and the p...
- 204
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.
10 Jun 2010The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.
12 Mar 2019The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...
- 19
