Search Results for "ouster clause"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Duplicate Share Certificates Under Section 84(4) of Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Title Requires Civil Suit, Not Summary Company Application

The appellant, Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi & Bros. Pvt. Ltd., filed a company application under Section 84(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking duplic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff Granted 1/3rd Share Based on Contribution. Court held that the plaintiff's claim for 2/3rd share was barred by res judicata due to dismissal of earlier suit for recovery of contribution amount.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Dr. Bhalchandra Govind Kshirsagar (plaintiff) against his family members (defendants) seeking a 2/3rd shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Avail Services of Legal Practitioner in Domestic Inquiry - Right to Representation Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that refusal to permit legal representation violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Ajit Bhagwan Sawant, a workman employed by M/s. Parveen Industries Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to a domestic inquiry by the employer. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Modifies Trial Court's Decree on Self-Acquired Properties. The court upheld the trial court's finding on joint family property but excluded certain items from partition due to lack of evidence of jointness.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (daughters and widow) against the appellants (sons) for partition of suit schedule propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Public Trust in Property Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Sections 79 and 80 of Bombay Public Trust Act. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Recovery of Possession by Trust Against Third Parties is Maintainable Under Section 50 of the Act.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed by Seth Kasturmal Dalsukh Dharmashala, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (...