Search Results for "expeditious execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "expeditious execution"

421 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 421 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Satisfaction of Mortgage and Reassignment of Property. The Arbitral Award Had Directed the Mortgagor to Reassign Premises and Pay Outstanding Dues, Which the Legal Heirs of the Deceased Petitioner Contested on Various Grounds Including Improper Impleadment of Legal Representatives.

29 Oct 2010

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 1st December,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Refers Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The Court held that the referral court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must only examine the existence of an arbitration agreement on a prima facie basis, and the group of companies doctrine can bind a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement.

20 Sep 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

8 Jan 2020

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether DRT Mumbai Has Territorial Jurisdiction Under SARFAESI Act When Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai and Secured Property in Gujarat. Interpretation of Sections 17(7) SARFAESI Act and 19(1) RDDB Act and Applicability of CPC Section 16 to Securitization Applications.

15 Dec 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 8 October 20...

High Court

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

7 May 2010

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property for Non-Compliance with Recovery Rules. Court holds that failure to serve notice of sale proclamation on the judgment-debtor at his updated address vitiates the sale, but the petitioners failed to approach the Recovery Officer under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 within the prescribed period or seek condonation of delay with sufficient cause.

10 Jun 2015

The petitioners, M/s. Hotel Paras Garden and its proprietor Prabhakar Digambar Lande, challenged the auction sale of their mortgaged property conducte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Dispute Over Dishonoured Cheque — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Liability of Guarantors. Court sets aside summary judgment and grants unconditional leave to defend, holding that the appellants raised triable issues including whether the loan was repaid and whether the guarantors were discharged.

17 Dec 2016

The case arises from a summary suit filed by Anthony Maharaj (respondent) against Morpheus Media Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and others (appellants) for recove...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)