KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "earlier division bench decision"
8842 result(s) found
Found 8842 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...
- 31
High Court
Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.
9 Jul 2024The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...
- 375
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.
23 Dec 2015The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.
13 Jul 2026The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...
- 56
High Court
High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Legislative Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Section 151-A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Election Commission's Notification Declared Illegal as Incoming Member's Term Would Be Less Than One Year from Date of Election Result, Violating Mandatory Proviso Clause (a).
8 Apr 2026The dispute arose from two writ petitions challenging the Election Commission of India's Notification dated 16.03.2026 for conducting a bye-election t...
- 744
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.
24 Aug 2012The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Concerning Applicability of Interest on Delayed Payments Act to Prior Contracts. The appeals arise from a common question of law regarding the retrospective application of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993.
1 Aug 2026The appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common question of law regarding the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Petitions for Enforcement and Setting Aside of Foreign Arbitration Award — Partial Award on Jurisdiction Upheld; Challenge under Section 34 Considered Inappropriate for Foreign Award. Enforcement of Award under Sections 44-49 Proceeded While Section 34 Petition Found Not Maintainable Against a Foreign Award Governed by English Law.
9 May 2014The dispute arose from an agency agreement between Perma Container (UK) Line Limited (claimant), a UK company, and Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. L...
- 20
