Search Results for "committal delay"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 307, 506 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.07.2016 passed by the learned I Addl. Sessions Judge at Vijayapur in S.C.No.163/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeals were filed by accused No.1 (Harish) and accused No.3 (Lokesh @ Sathish) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.04.2017 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on testimony of interested witnesses and failure to hold Test Identification Parade rendered identification doubtful.

The case pertains to the murder of Ketan Bansode and Siddiq Arkate on 14th August 2014 at around 9:30 PM near a hotel in Talwade, Pune. The first info...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Whether Conviction Under Sections 376 and 354 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Is Sustainable on Evidence of Attempted Penetration. Court Considers Requirement of Penetration for Rape and Impact of Delayed FIR and Prior Opportunities to Complain.

The present appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Siddharth Dagadu Sonde, by the learned Special Judge, Pune, in Special Child Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in House Trespass Case — Conviction Based on Testimony of Injured Eyewitnesses and Motive of Theft and Removal from Service.

The appellant, Sadashiv Basappa Madgyal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Sections 302, 324 and 452 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nagaraj, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, in Sessions Case No.35/2016 for the offence punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...