Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

589 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 589 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.

20 Dec 2019

The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.

3 Apr 2013

The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

21 Nov 2006

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Disposes Three Criminal Applications in Matrimonial Dispute Seeking Quashing of FIRs. Accusations Involve IPC, POCSO Act, and Juvenile Justice Act Allegations Between Family Members.

3 Jul 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with three interconnected proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute between a husband (Prakash Hotch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization Process in Police Recruitment — Equi-Percentile Method Valid for Multi-Session Exams. Standardized Equi-Percentile Method for Normalization of Marks Across Different Sessions of Written Examination Held Permissible Under Uttar Pradesh Sub Inspector and Inspector (Police) Service Rules, 2015.

7 Jan 2022

The case pertains to the recruitment process for 2400 posts of Sub-Inspector of Police, 210 posts of Platoon Commander (PAC), and 97 posts of Fire Off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Group of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Slum Land Acquisition Provisions. The Petitioners, Owners of Lands Declared as Slum Areas, Challenge the Acquisition Notices Issued Under Section 14 and the Method of Compensation Under Section 17 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

10 May 2013

In Mumbai, where more than half the population lives in slums, the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 was ena...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

30 Oct 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)